Women Doctors Causing
Problems for the NHS
UK GP
shortage to worsen as young doctors switch to part-time work.
June 2003
More
than half of all students taking up scarce places at medical school are women -
yet, after 10 years, 60 per cent of them have given up, leaving a huge hole in
the NHS. The same goes for teaching. Alice Thomson -
September 2012 -
Rising numbers of women doctors working part time present a “huge risk” to
the NHS, the General Medical Council is warning, with hospitals
potentially having to employ many more foreign-trained medics to plug
gaps.
January 2014
Although I am a feminist — in the NHS hospital in which I work as a
surgeon, some of the best doctors are women — this shift of the gender
balance in medicine is a worrying trend. Professor J Thomas
I believe it is creating serious workforce problems, and has
profound implications for the way the NHS works.
...........................
The continuing deterioration of the National Health
Service despite the enormous extra sums of money being put into it by the
taxpayer is largely thanks to the training of more and more women to become
doctors in the place of men.
the requirement to give women 'equal
opportunities' ... is leading to far worse conditions and shortfalls in
the NHS
In areas such as medicine, the requirement to give women 'equal
opportunities' by demanding that medical schools try to train as many women as
they do men to become doctors is leading to far worse conditions and shortfalls
in the NHS - a service that is already failing the country abysmally.
The fact that so many of these women doctors will take out years from their
profession in order to have children and to look after them (with some never
returning) is a major drain on a system that is already unable to cope.
In theory, it sounds great to have as many women doctors working in the NHS
as men. In practice, however, the consequence is that EVERYONE has to wait a
good deal longer to be dealt with, and the entire service is considerably less
efficient.
And with waiting lists already far too long even for urgent surgical
operations, the price for this 'equality' is rather high. And it costs some
people their health and some people their lives.
Most people have a great deal of sympathy with the view
that women should be permitted to become doctors working for the NHS if they
have the requisite abilities - even if they do log out of the system to bring up
families. But there is a price to be paid. In the case of the NHS, everyone who
uses it pays a price - particularly the old, the young, the weak, the vulnerable
and the sick.
In fact, the most needy of all pay the
price!
And these are mostly women.
many times more women are negatively
affected by an impoverished NHS than there are women doctors.
Indeed, many times more women are negatively
affected by an impoverished NHS than there are women doctors.
Indeed, all women are affected by
this.
Further, of course, all of us will need
medical treatment at some stage in our lives, and so all of us will suffer from
the adverse effects of an NHS that is greatly diminished by the low long-term
career aspirations of a relatively small number of women.
[January 2014 - UK citizens will now be aware that tens of thousands of
people are known to have died over the years - with thousands more having
received appalling treatment - because of the serious shortcomings that
have arisen in the NHS over the past three decades.]
Furthermore, the training of doctors is a very
expensive business that stretches well beyond the five years that students spend
at medical school. And with 60% of women doctors giving up their careers within
ten years, the training of women to become doctors is largely a waste of
taxpayers' money.
Moreover, the country loses the potential
talents of all those young men who would have embarked upon long-term careers in
medicine were it not for the fact that women were taking up the places at
medical schools.
And, of course, as with all the major professions, experience is just about everything. And so
when women doctors in the NHS give up their careers after a few years of work, the
country is denied the services of men doctors who would actually have had the
same period of experience.
And who would then have gone on to get
even more experience.
In other words, these future highly-experienced
doctors are lost forever.
In summary, the training of women to become
doctors significantly degrades the health system. It harms the most needy of
people the most. It negatively impacts on all of us. It is a waste of taxpayers'
money. And it persistently deprives the country of a large number of
highly experienced
doctors.
But that's feminism for you.
As in so many other areas, it has a huge cost.
And why do we inflict this huge cost upon the
nation?
We do this so that a few thousand women can benefit
from having a career in medicine
We do this so that a few thousand women can
benefit from having a career in medicine, with most of them
choosing to abandon it for something more to their liking.
What is the solution? Do we stop women from
becoming doctors by giving all the limited number of places at medical schools
to men?
Well, the purpose of this article was not to
provide a particular solution to this problem, but to point out that this is yet
another area where feminism extracts a very large price from just about everyone
for the benefit
of a few women. This needs to be pointed out rather than swept under the
carpet.
Indeed, this ideology puts more importance on the career aspirations of
a few thousand women than it does on the health of the entire nation;
including the health of our children!
this issue also highlights the impossibility of
achieving the 'gender equity'
Furthermore, this issue also highlights the
impossibility of achieving the 'gender equity' so often loudly espoused by
current-day feminists with rarely a thought to what it might actually mean. The
phrase 'gender equity' is virtually meaningless.
For example, how, exactly, does one achieve 'gender equity'
with regard to the training of women doctors?
Do we force women doctors to
stay at their posts so that the gender balance of highly-experienced doctors remains
the same throughout the decades?
Would this achieve 'gender equity'?
No. It would not. And there would be permanent
public outrage orchestrated by the feminists on the grounds of
sex-discrimination.
Do we train twice as many women doctors as men
Do we train twice as many women doctors as men
in medical schools to allow for the fact that half of the women will drop out -
on the grounds that unless we do this women will not have access
to the same number of experienced women doctors as men have to men
doctors?
Would this achieve 'gender equity'?
No. It would not. Such a solution would
clearly discriminate very heavily against talented young men who wanted to go to medical school. And
it would result in the most enormous waste of taxpayers money and a diversion of scarce
educational resources toward the very group of people - women - most likely to squander them,
with the negative consequences being worst for the most sick and the most
vulnerable people in our society.
So. What 'equitable' solutions to this particular
problem of women doctors choosing to quit the medical profession would 'gender equity' feminists
actually propose?
And what do we do about the feminist mullahs
and their media lackeys who continue stirring up hatred toward men by blaming
them for the fact that relatively few women eventually reach high office in the
world of medicine despite the case being that it is clearly the women themselves who,
statistically speaking, have little interest in achieving high office?
Forty years ago, those who interviewed
students who wanted places at medical schools used to grill them very
aggressively with questions designed to find out how likely they were to stick
with the profession once they had qualified. They did not want to expend their
scarce resources training people who were going to end up wasting them.
Nowadays, however, no expense is spared in
order to pander to the selfish desires of a few women, no matter how detrimental
these desires may be to the lives of everyone else.
...
UK Crippling Africa's Healthcare Many
doctors overseas apply to work in the UK each year The UK is crippling
sub-Saharan Africa's healthcare system by poaching its staff, UK doctors have
warned.
we actually have to poach doctors from
some very impoverished parts of the world
Yep; we actually have to poach doctors from
some very impoverished parts of the world because 60% of our own women doctors give up
their jobs within ten years, with a further huge percentage only willing to work
part time.
Despite the appalling problems that this
causes to our health service and, as indicated above, also to those impoverished
people who live in countries that cannot afford to lose their doctors to us, we,
in the UK, will continue to waste our precious medical resources training
annually a few thousand women who wish to play around at being doctors for a
short number of years.
And we will continue to do this because
nothing, absolutely nothing, must stand in the way of even a small number of
women doing whatever they want to do, no matter how much is the cost to everyone
else.
The scale of the influx of foreign doctors and nurses into the British health service has been disclosed.
It shows that nearly 190,000 doctors and nurses have come to the country from outside the EU in just eight years.
...
Bleeding
Africa Dry
|